National Election 2015
In addition, activity by Boko Harama terrorist group based in northeast Nigeria has increasingly taken on a gendered dimension, contributing to an insecure environment for women that may not be be conducive to political participation. The Transition Monitoring Group (TMG), which monitored the 2015 Nigerian elections, for example, had difficulty recruiting women monitors due to their fear of violence in certain regions, particularly the north.
To improve understanding of VAW-E in Nigeria, NDI and the International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA) organized a multi-pronged approach in the run-up to the Nigerian state elections in the autumn of 2015. Under the “Stop Violence Against Women in Elections” (Stop-VAWIE) campaign, FIDA and NDI designed an information-gathering effort that drew on focus group discussions and a citizen hotline, in addition to election observation data. The campaign informed policy recommendations and a report issued to legislators, civil society activists and other stakeholders that contributed solutions to mitigate and stop VAW-E.
Drawing from the experiences of other groups, TMG’s leadership adopted an expanded focus on VAW-E as they designed their methodology for state elections, which included collecting more detailed, gender-disaggregated data on a wider spectrum of incidents. They accomplished this by implementing changes in the forms observers used so they could collect more specific data on critical incidents. For the national election, the forms asked for data on the type of incident, while the forms developed for the state-level elections also included a clear way for observers to indicate the gender of both victims and perpetrators. This resulted in TMG having more detailed data and a way to measure violence or intimidation of candidates because of their gender, vandalism or destruction of properties belonging to candidates or their supporters, and the use of derogatory language aimed at women candidates, in addition to hate speech.
In Nigeria’s 2015 elections, the Transition Monitoring Group (TMG) observed two separate electoral processes. The first was national elections in the spring, followed by state elections later in the year. During this observation, TMG gathered information about the presence of gender-based hate speech, including capturing data that allowed it to present regional differences in the presence of this form of hate speech. TMG also engaged in ongoing discussions about the issue with other organizations, and continued to build knowledge in preparation for the second, state-level elections. This sustained engagement, which deepened TMG’s understanding of VAW-E, also sparked new and expanded ideas for incorporating VAW-E into its monitoring efforts for the local elections, despite the challenges of having its observers, even for the state elections, spread over a large area.
Before the Election
Unlike TMG’s election day observation, observers were not distributed via sample-based methodology, and therefore the reported data is not statistically representative. However, it does provide a detailed look into the general trends and environment of the pre-election period.
In the state elections of Kogi and Bayelsa, TMG again deployed observers systematically throughout each state. In each observation, TMG employed a quick count methodology to monitor election day processes and record any incidents related to election procedures or violence.
About the Observation
In its national pre-election observation, TMG deployed observers from November, 2014 to February, 2015, in each of the 774 local government areas (LGAs) of Nigeria to gather information about the general environment, including early warning signs of electoral violence. For the state-level pre-election observations, TMG also deployed observers throughout Kogi and Bayelsa state. While the observers in each monitoring effort were not systematically deployed according to a statistically-developed sample, the data they collected provides a depth of information on the general trends and electoral environment. Observers in the pre-election period reported incidents of violence that they witnessed directly, as well as incidents reported to them by credible third parties such as media outlets or community members and verified via a four-step process.
For the election day observations at a national and state level, TMG systematically deployed observers and collected information on critical incidents as well as conducting successful parallel vote tabulations (PVTs), also referred to as a Quick Count. In the national election, TMG deployed over 3,000 observers, collecting more than 125,000 individual data points about election day.